Cases 31 - 40 of 546
RAMBO v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv01731
Petitioner:
SHARON H. RAMBO
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
BACON et al v. USA
as 1:2022cv01724
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL L. BACON, TERRY D. BLISS, DEBORAH J. BLISS and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
OSBURN v. USA
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2022cv01689
Plaintiff:
WESLEY H. OSBURN
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Betilez v. OPM
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 22-2266
Petitioner:
CONSTANTINO H. BETILEZ
Respondent:
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
SAVAGE v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv01342
Petitioner:
DEBBIE H. SAVAGE
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
PARKMAN v. USA
as 1:2022cv01036
Plaintiff:
BRUCE H. PARKMAN
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Adee Honey Farms v. US
as 22-2105
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MONTEREY MUSHROOMS, INC.
Plaintiff:
ADEE HONEY FARMS, A. H. MEYER & SONS INC., MARK ALMETER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES, UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION and CHRISTOPHER MAGNUS, Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Regal Beloit America, Inc. v. ITC
as 22-2033
Appellant:
REGAL BELOIT AMERICA, INC., ALAN H. NORMAN and DAVID B. JINKINS
Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
DINH et al v. USA
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2022cv00725
Plaintiff:
JOHNATHAN H. DINH and DWIGHT D. JERECZEK
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.