Cases 31 - 40 of 66
ROSE v. USA
as 1:2010cv00224
Plaintiff:
JOHN GARY ROSE
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
COTTER v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2009vv00715
Petitioner:
ROSE COTTER
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
Type:
Other Statutes
WILLIAMS et al v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2009vv00664
Petitioner:
LAVORIS WILLIAMS , ROSE WILLIAMS and MATTHEW WILLIAMS
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
Type:
Other Statutes
ADKINS et al v. USA
as 1:2009cv00503
Plaintiff:
WILMA N. ADKINS , HOWARD BURROWS , GONNER FARM, LLC., and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
DELAWARE VALLEY FLORAL V SHAW ROSE
as 09-1357
Plaintiff-Appellee:
Choice Farms Corp., Continental Farms, LLC, Continental Flowers, Inc. and others
Defendant-Appellant:
Kenneth P. Shaw and Shaw Rose Nets, LLC
BRIGHT V US
as 09-5048
Amicus Curiae:
Albert J. Robison, Baley Trotman Farms, Byrne Brothers and others
Plaintiff-Appellant:
B. Lorene Soper, Brady J. Stuart, Clarence Forkner and others
Defendant-Appellee:
United States
AVOCENT REDMOND V ROSE ELECTRONICS
as 08-1564
Defendant-Appellee:
Aten International Co., Ltd., Aten Technology, Inc., Belkin Corporation and others
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Avocent Redmond Corp.
PROMETHEUS LAB V MAYO COLLABORATIVE
as 08-1403
Amicus Curiae:
ARUP Laboratories, Inc., American Intellectual Property Law Association, Biotechnology Industry Organization and others
Defendant-Appellee:
Mayo Clinic Rochester and Mayo Collaborative Services (dba Mayo Medical Laboratories)
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.
AVOCENT REDMOND CORP. v. USA
as 1:2008cv00069
Plaintiff:
AVOCENT REDMOND CORP.
Defendant:
USA
Thirdparty_defendant:
ROSE ELECTRONICS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
