Cases 51 - 60 of 100
GENZLER et al v. USA
as 1:2013cv00315
Plaintiff:
DONNA GENZLER , DENNIS LEWIS , GOLDIE ENGLAND and others
Defendant:
USA
GLENARDEN, L.P. et al v. USA
as 1:1997cv05830
Plaintiff:
GLENARDEN, L.P. , DANIEL M. LYONS , LESTER M. LEWIS and others
Defendant:
USA
KATZIN et al v. USA
as 1:2012cv00384
Plaintiff:
RICHARD LEWIS KATZIN , MARY BETH KATZIN-SIMON , ANNETTE KATZIN and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
KUZEMCZAK-LEWIS v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2011vv00243
Petitioner:
IRENA KUZEMCZAK-LEWIS
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
Type:
Other Statutes
LEWIS V DVA
as 11-7090
Respondent-Appellee:
Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Claimant-Appellant:
Randall R. Lewis
LEWIS v. USA
as 1:2011cv00071
IN RE LEITHEM
as 11-1030
Appellant:
Charles A. Kremers, Karl D. Sears, Peter R. Abitz and others
Appellee:
David J. Kappos, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, David J. Kappos, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, David J. Kappos, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and others
CARPENTER V DVA
as 10-7134
Respondent-Appellee:
Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs and others
Claimant-Appellant:
Lewis Carpenter, Lewis Carpenter, Lewis Carpenter and others
LEWIS V DVA
as 10-7122
Claimant-Appellant:
Earl Lewis, Earl Lewis, Earl Lewis and others
Respondent-Appellee:
Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs and others
LEWIS et al v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2010vv00304
Petitioner:
ANTHONY DWAYNE LEWIS, Jr., ANTHONY LEWIS and ELAINE LEWIS
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.