Cases 51 - 60 of 8,434
HOCKADAY v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00921
Petitioner:
AUTUMN HOCKADAY
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
ROGERS v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00920
Petitioner:
TINA ROGERS
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
ARANA v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00918
Petitioner:
OSCAR ARANA
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
SANDLIN v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00915
Petitioner:
DORIAN SANDLIN
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
STRICKLAND v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00912
Petitioner:
KATIE STRICKLAND
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Janich v. McDonough
as 24-1944
Claimant:
STEVEN O. JANICH
Respondent:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
HUERTA v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00900
Petitioner:
DIANNE HUERTA
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
CULLITON v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00901
Petitioner:
LINDA C. CULLITON
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
LYON v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00902
Petitioner:
RODNEY LYON
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
ROWE v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00904
Petitioner:
TERESA ROWE
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
