Cases 1 - 10 of 233
DoDots Licensing Solutions LLCIn re: DoDots Licensing Solutions LLC
as 24-100
Petitioner:
In re: DODOTS LICENSING SOLUTIONS LLC
Respondent:
APPLE INC., BEST BUY STORES, L.P., BESTBUY.COM, LLC and others
ANTWERP LIMITED L.P. et al
as 1:2023cv01643
Plaintiff:
ANTWERP LIMITED L.P., DIAMONDHEAD MANOR LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, JAMES MANOR LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
G&H DIVERSIFIED MFG, L.P. v. USA
as 1:2023cv01450
Plaintiff:
G&H DIVERSIFIED MFG, L.P.
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
233RD STREET PARTNERSHIP, L.P. v. USA
as 1:2023cv01358
Plaintiff:
233RD STREET PARTNERSHIP, L.P.
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
SOF CYPRESS PARK OWNER, L.P. v. USA
as 1:2023cv01329
Plaintiff:
SOF CYPRESS PARK OWNER, L.P.
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
SILVERADO APARTMENTS INVESTOR, L.P. v. USA
as 1:2023cv01328
Plaintiff:
SILVERADO APARTMENTS INVESTOR, L.P.
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Etchegoinberry v. US
as 23-2196
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL ETCHEGOINBERRY, ERIK CLAUSEN, BARLOW FAMILY FARMS, L.P. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
6 BRIAR HILLS INVESTMENTS, L.P., ET AL. v. USA
as 1:2023cv00834
Plaintiff:
6 BRIAR HILLS INVESTMENTS, L.P., ET AL.
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
SeAH Steel Corp. v. US
as 23-1657
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SEAH STEEL CORP.
Plaintiff:
HUSTEEL CO., LTD., NEXTEEL CO., LTD., AJU BESTEEL CO., LTD. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES, UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION, MAVERICK TUBE CORP. and others
RANCHO VISTA DEL MAR et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv00125
Plaintiff:
RANCHO VISTA DEL MAR, OTAY INTERNATIONAL, LLC., OTAY MESA PROPERTY L.P. and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
