Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Mike Finnin Motors, Inc. v. US
as 20-1205
Plaintiff:
MILLER-CAMPBELL COMPANY, MATT MONTGOMERY, INC., ROHR-ALPHA MOTORS, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GUETTERMAN MOTORS, INC. and MIKE FINNIN MOTORS, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Taylor & Sons, Inc. v. US
as 20-1185
Plaintiff:
MILLER-CAMPBELL COMPANY, MATT MONTGOMERY, INC., ROHR-ALPHA MOTORS, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WHITEY'S, INC., RFJS COMPANY, LLC, LIVONIA CHRYSLER JEEP, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
COURVAL et al v. USA
as 1:2012cv00482
Plaintiff:
KENNETH COURVAL and TED TATE
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
BOYKIN v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2010vv00413
Petitioner:
TED BOYKIN
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
NORDHUS et al v. USA
as 1:2009cv00042
Plaintiff:
ANNA F. NORDHUS , FRANCIS A NORDHUS , CORNELIUS FAMILY TRUST and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
PROMETHEUS LAB V MAYO COLLABORATIVE
as 08-1403
Amicus Curiae:
ARUP Laboratories, Inc., American Intellectual Property Law Association, Biotechnology Industry Organization and others
Defendant-Appellee:
Mayo Clinic Rochester and Mayo Collaborative Services (dba Mayo Medical Laboratories)
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.
BRODOWY V US
as 06-5113
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Carolyn M. Gandy, Clyde A. Smith, Dirk G. Brown and others
Defendant-Appellee:
United States
IN RE WRIGHT
as 06-1449
Appellee:
Jon W. Dudas, Director, Patent and Trademark Office
Appellant:
Ted Eugene Wright
MCDONALD V MIYAZAKI
as 04-1245
Appellee:
AKIHIRO IWAMATSU, HIROSHI MIYAZAKI, KINYA OHGAMI and others
Appellant:
TED P. MCDONALD
AERATION SOLUTIONS V DICKMAN
as 03-1284
Plaintiff-Appellant:
AERATION SOLUTIONS, INC.
Defendant-Appellee:
DANIEL H. DICKMAN and TED K. VOLLMER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
