Cases 111 - 120 of 124
WALTMAN V DVA
as 02-7177
Respondent-Appellee:
ANTHONY J. PRINCIPI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, ANTHONY J. PRINCIPI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, ANTHONY J. PRINCIPI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs and others
Claimant-Appellant:
WALTER S. WALTMAN, WALTER S. WALTMAN, WALTER S. WALTMAN and others
WALTERS V DVA
as 02-7059
Respondent-Appellee:
ANTHONY J. PRINCIPI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, ANTHONY J. PRINCIPI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, ANTHONY J. PRINCIPI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs and others
Claimant-Appellant:
FREDERICK W. WALTERS, FREDERICK W. WALTERS, FREDERICK W. WALTERS and others
KRABICHLER V VA
as 01-3380
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Petitioner:
WALTER A. KRABICHLER
MURRAY V DVA
as 01-7095
Respondent-Appellee:
ANTHONY J. PRINCIPI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Claimant-Appellant:
WALTER A. MURRAY, JR.
FREEMAN v. USA
as 1:2001cv00039
Plaintiff:
WALTER B. FREEMAN
Defendant:
USA
Amicu:
SISKIYOU REGIONAL EDUCATION PROJECT and MINERAL POLICY CENTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
JOHNSON V US
as 01-5021
Plaintiff-Appellant:
RICHARD WALTER JOHNSON, RICHARD WALTER JOHNSON and RICHARD WALTER JOHNSON
Defendant-Appellee:
UNITED STATES, UNITED STATES and UNITED STATES
IN RE LARSEN
as 01-1092
Appellee:
NICHOLAS GODICI, Acting Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark, NICHOLAS GODICI, Acting Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark and NICHOLAS GODICI, Acting Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark
NICHOLAS GODICI, Acting Director, U.S. Patent And Trademark:
, and
Appellant:
WALTER L. LARSEN, WALTER L. LARSEN and WALTER L. LARSEN
GLASS V US
as 00-5137
Plaintiff-Appellee:
BOBBY J. GLASS, CAROL ROSE (INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TRUSTEE OF THE WALTER LEWIS ROSE, III ESTATE TRUST), FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION and others
Defendant-Appellant:
UNITED STATES
KIRK V DVA
as 00-7173
Respondent-Appellee:
HERSHEL W. GOBER, Acting Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Claimant-Appellant:
WALTER D. KIRK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
