Cases 11 - 20 of 105
MIDATLANTIC CONSTRUCTION & DESIGN ASSOCIATES, INC. v. USA
as 1:2022cv00447
Plaintiff:
MIDATLANTIC CONSTRUCTION & DESIGN ASSOCIATES, INC.
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
LIGHTBOX PARENT, L.P. v. USA
as 1:2022cv00429
Plaintiff:
LIGHTBOX PARENT, L.P.
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor Defendant:
COSTQUEST ASSOCIATES INC. and COSTQUEST ASSOCIATES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Bangkok Bangkok Import & Export Inc. v. 2M Associates, Inc.
as 22-1584
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BANGKOK BANGKOK IMPORT & EXPORT INC.
Defendant / Appellant:
2M ASSOCIATES, INC. and ALPHA BAH
Dave Carter Associates, Inc. v. United States et al
as 1:2022cv00034
Plaintiff:
Dave Carter Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
United States, United States Customs and Border Protection and United States Trade Representative
Dave Carter Associates, Inc. v. United States et al
as 1:2022cv00021
Plaintiff:
Dave Carter Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
United States, United States Customs and Border Protection and United States Trade Representative
Jackson v. US
as 22-1276
Plaintiff / Appellee:
GLORIA J. JACKSON, DAVID ALCANTARA, SHEYLAH ALCIDE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Olsen v. US
as 21-2034
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KATHERINE HOPE DAVIS, OMAR CANO, BRUCE OLSEN and others
Plaintiff:
ANNA GRIFFITH
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Filler v. US
as 21-1552
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AARON GERSHON FILLER, as an individual and on behalf of Neurografix-Sole Proprietorship, NEUROGRAFIX, IMAGE-BASED SURGICENTER CORPORATION and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Banes v. US
as 21-1529
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HUGUETTE BLACK, CARLOS MAZAS, GEORGE MANN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Meadows on Memorial Owners v. US
as 21-1214
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KAWAL KAREAH, XINDI BENAVENTE, KIMBERLY BOOTH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
