Cases 11 - 20 of 25
BARNES v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2009vv00603
Petitioner:
MORGAN BARNES
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 300
Type:
Other Statutes
BARNES V US
as 09-5125
Plaintiff-Appellant:
David P. Brown, Deborah A. George, Enda C. Holleran-Naughton and others
Defendant-Appellee:
United States
THERASENSE V BECTON
as 08-1511
Amicus Curiae:
1st Media, LLC, Acacia Research Corporation, Alejandro Martinez and others
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Abbott Laboratories and TheraSense, Inc. (n/k/a Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc.)
Defendant-Appellee:
Bayer HealthCare LLC, Becton, Dickinson and Company and Nova Biomedical Corporation
BALL AEROSOL V LIMITED BRANDS
as 08-1333
Plaintiff-Appellee:
Ball Aerosol and Specialty Container, Inc.
Defendant-Appellant:
Bath & Body Works, Inc., Bath & Body Works, Inc. (d/b/a The White Barn Candle Co.), Henri Bendel, Inc. and others
REALSOURCE V BEST BUY
as 07-1387
Defendant/Cross Appellant:
Best Buy Co., Inc., Best Buy Enterprise Services, Inc. and Best Buy Stores, LP
Defendant-Appellee:
Circuit City Stores, Inc., Costco Wholesale Corporation, Lowe's Companies, Inc. and others
Lowe's Companies, Inc:
Pottery Barn, Inc:
Plaintiff-Appellant:
RealSource, Inc. (d/b/a RealSource Communications, Inc.)
BARNES V DVA
as 06-7118
Claimant-Appellee:
James F. Barnes
Respondent-Appellant:
R. James Nicholson, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
BARNES V OPM
as 06-3150
Petitioner:
Linda F. Barnes, Linda F. Barnes and Linda F. Barnes
Respondent:
Office of Personnel Management, Office of Personnel Management and Office of Personnel Management
BARNES V US
as 06-5036
Plaintiff-Cross Appellant:
DANNY T. BARNES, DANNY T. BARNES and DANNY T. BARNES
Defendant-Appellant:
UNITED STATES, UNITED STATES and UNITED STATES
BARNES V US
as 06-5030
Plaintiff-Cross Appellant:
DANNY T. BARNES, DANNY T. BARNES and DANNY T. BARNES
Defendant-Appellant:
UNITED STATES, UNITED STATES and UNITED STATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
