Cases 11 - 20 of 22
CHARLES F. DAY & ASSOCIATES, LLC. v. USA
as 1:2015cv00289
Plaintiff:
CHARLES F. DAY & ASSOCIATES, LLC
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor_defendant:
LOYAL SOURCE GOVERNMENT SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
DAY v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2013vv00620
Petitioner:
RUTH DAY
Defendant:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
Type:
Other Statutes
CHARLES F. DAY & ASSOCIATES LLC v. USA
as 1:2013cv00308
Plaintiff:
CHARLES F. DAY & ASSOCIATES, LLC.
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor_defendant:
ANAUTICS, INC.
DAY v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2012vv00630
Petitioner:
LAURA DAY
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
SUTARDJA et al v. USA
as 1:2011cv00724
Plaintiff:
SEHAT SUTARDJA and WEILI DAI
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
DAY v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2010vv00833
Petitioner:
BRENDA DAY
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
HOWARD et al v. USA
as 1:2009cv00575
Plaintiff:
HENRY L. HOWARD , CLIFFORD E. MILLER AND MAY A. MILLER REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST , ROYAL CENTER MASONIC LODGE NO. 585 and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
DAY V DVA
as 08-7097
Claimant-Appellant:
Gary Day
Respondent-Appellee:
James B. Peake, M.D., Secretary of Veterans Affairs
DAY V DVA
as 02-7181
Respondent-Appellee:
ANTHONY J. PRINCIPI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, ANTHONY J. PRINCIPI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, ANTHONY J. PRINCIPI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs and others
Claimant-Appellant:
RALPH DAY, RALPH DAY, RALPH DAY and others
MONSANTO CO V THOMASON
as 01-1643
Defendant:
3-T COTTON FARMS OF RAYVILLE, INC. and LASLEY D. THOMASON
Defendant-Appellant:
BALE-A-DAY, INC., CHARLES F. THOMASON, DALLAS THOMASON and others
Plaintiff-Appellee:
DELTA AND PINE LAND COMPANY and MONSANTO COMPANY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
