Cases 11 - 20 of 59
BROOKS v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv01892
Petitioner:
TIFFANY BROOKS
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Brooks v. McDonough
as 23-1062
Claimant:
JOHN F. BROOKS
Respondent / Appellee:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
BROOKS v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv01487
Petitioner:
COURTNEY BROOKS
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
RIVERA v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv01310
Petitioner:
BROOKE RIVERA
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Biodelivery Sciences International, Inc. v. Alvogen PB Research & Development LLC
as 22-1449
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BIODELIVERY SCIENCES INTERNATIONAL, INC. and ARIUS TWO, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
ALVOGEN PB RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC, ALVOGEN MALTA OPERATIONS LTD., ALVOGEN PINE BROOK, LLC and others
Biodelivery Sciences International, Inc. v. Alvogen PB Research & Development LLC
as 22-1394
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BIODELIVERY SCIENCES INTERNATIONAL, INC. and ARIUS TWO, INC.
Defendant / Appellant:
ALVOGEN PB RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC, ALVOGEN MALTA OPERATIONS LTD., ALVOGEN PINE BROOK, LLC and others
Pharmacyclics LLC v. Alvogen, Inc.
as 21-2270
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PHARMACYCLICS LLC and JANSSEN BIOTECH, INC.
Defendant / Appellant:
ALVOGEN PINE BROOK, LLC, NATCO PHARMA LIMITED and ALVOGEN, INC.
Townsend v. Brooks Sports, Inc.
as 21-2143
Appellant:
HERBERT E. TOWNSEND
Appellee:
BROOKS SPORTS, INC.
Abbas v. US
as 21-1207
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CRISTINA GRIGORIAN, KELSI MOORE, JASON KIM and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Cueto v. US
as 21-1171
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES J. LLOYD, JOHN PARSLEY, BROOKE KEENEY and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
