Cases 11 - 20 of 58
Barlow v. US
as 22-1381
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM E. BARLOW, TWILA L. BARLOW, REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES, LLC and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
RiggsIn re: Riggs
as 21-2108
Appellant:
RALPH K. BRECHTER, LOUIS F. INDELICATO, JON L. CLOW and others
Appellee:
ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
MorrisIn re: Morris
as 21-1854
Appellant:
GLENN RIGGS, In re: JESSICA MORRIS, KENNETH HOWARD and others
Appellee:
ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Whitford v. US
as 21-1394
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THORNWOOD FUND, DENISE GRANDPRE, JOANA C. ANDERSON and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Blake v. US
as 21-1250
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GREGORY NIKKEL, DANIEL COURSON, LAWRENCE DANIELS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Azar v. US
as 21-1222
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHEILA SULLIVAN, TIMOTHY BUNDA, MARGARET C. WILSON and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Big Oak Farms, Inc. v. US
as 19-1748
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAURA B. MEEK FOR JANET BONDURANT Q-TIP TRUST, SAMMIE L. PONDER, LESLIE FOX FARMS, L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
MARTY HUTCHISON, TERRY HEQUENBOURG, BURKE LAND CO. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Alford v. US
as 19-1678
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JAMES LUKE, RONALD WILSON, TROY ALFORD and others
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES
GLENN-COLUSA IRRIGATION DISTRICT v. USA
as 1:2015cv01572
Plaintiff:
GLENN-COLUSA IRRIGATION DISTRICT
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
JEFFERYS v. USA
as 1:2015cv01366
Plaintiff:
GLENN J. JEFFERYS, JR.
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
