Cases 11 - 20 of 74
WDM Inc. v. United States et al
as 1:2022cv00154
Plaintiff:
WDM Inc. d/b/a Wood Designs and WDM Inc. doing business as Wood Designs
Defendant:
United States of America, Office of the United States Trade Representative, U.S. Trade Rep. Katherine C. Tai and others
Shoe Cover Magic, Inc. v. United States et al
as 1:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
Shoe Cover Magic, Inc.
Defendant:
United States Customs and Border Protection, United States Trade Representative, United States and others
Agilent Technologies, Inc. v. United States et al
as 1:2022cv00011
Plaintiff:
Agilent Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
United States, Office of the United States Trade Representative, Robert E. Lighthizer and others
Atkins v. Vilt
as 21-2313
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REBEKAH A. ATKINS
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES J. VILT, JR., DREW D'AGOSTINO, KIM FERGUSON and others
Oman Fasteners, LLC v. US
as 21-2252
Plaintiff / Appellee:
OMAN FASTENERS, LLC, HUTTIG BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC. and HUTTIG, INC.
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., President of the United States, UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION and others
Morgan v. US
as 21-2232
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID BRIAN MORGAN
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Morgan v. US
as 21-2231
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID BRIAN MORGAN
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
PrimeSource Building Products, Inc. v. US
as 21-2066
Defendant / Appellant:
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, UNITED STATES, UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
PRIMESOURCE BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC.
Defendant:
AMERICAN STEEL NAIL COALITION
Jackson v. Wells Fargo, N.A.
as 21-1983
Petitioner:
TROY ADAM JACKSON
Respondent:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., WELLS FARGO, N.A. and BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
Anderson v. US
as 21-1445
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHERRY DIANE BRANDON HOLLOMAN, JUNIOR MORGAN, APALA D. WILSON and others
Plaintiff:
JAVIER SANCHEZ, DOE NO. 3, LOVIE LEE STANLEY and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
