Cases 11 - 20 of 574
Jordan v. McDonough
as 24-1323
Claimant:
WILLIAM P. JORDAN, III
Respondent / Appellee:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Linyi Chengen Import and Export Co., Ltd. v. US
as 24-1258
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LINYI CHENGEN IMPORT AND EXPORT CO., LTD., CELTIC CO., LTD., JIAXING GSUN IMPORT & EXPORT CO., LTD. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
COALITION FOR FAIR TRADE OF HARDWOOD PLYWOOD
Linyi Chengen Import and Export Co., Ltd. v. US
as 24-1259
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LINYI CHENGEN IMPORT AND EXPORT CO., LTD., CELTIC CO., LTD., JIAXING GSUN IMPORT & EXPORT CO., LTD. and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
COALITION FOR FAIR TRADE OF HARDWOOD PLYWOOD
A&P SHIPPING CORP., et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv02117
Plaintiff:
A&P SHIPPING CORP.,, ACORN INTERNATIONAL FORWARDING CO., ALLSTATES WORLDWIDE MOVERS, INC. and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
LYNCH v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv02119
Petitioner:
JOHN P. LYNCH
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Haggart v. US
as 24-1256
Plaintiff:
DANIEL HAGGART, KATHY HAGGART, Husband and Wife, For Themselves and As Representatives of a Class of Similarly Situated Persons, GORDON ARTHUR WOODLEY, Personal Counsel for Kittinger Deed Claimants and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENISE LYNN WOODLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
ABRAHAMS v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv02090
Petitioner:
JEFFREY P. ABRAHAMS
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
KHUC v. USA
as 1:2023cv02036
Plaintiff:
LUAN P. KHUC
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
COPE v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv01961
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY P. COPE
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
