Cases 11 - 20 of 8,415
CULLITON v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00901
Petitioner:
LINDA C. CULLITON
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
LYON v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00902
Petitioner:
RODNEY LYON
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
ROWE v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00904
Petitioner:
TERESA ROWE
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
NOUNOU v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00903
Petitioner:
KINDRA NOUNOU
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
HAKE v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00905
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY HAKE
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
TORRESO v SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00906
Petitioner:
LYNN LOUISE TORRESO
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Robinson v. McDonough
as 24-1932
Claimant:
TAMERIA R. ROBINSON
Respondent:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Estech Systems IP, LLCIn re: Estech Systems IP, LLC
as 24-1935
Appellant:
In re: ESTECH SYSTEMS IP, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
ADAMS v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00888
Petitioner:
ANDREA ADAMS
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
RONSON v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00895
Petitioner:
TERIN RONSON
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
