Cases 11 - 20 of 8,410
RONSON v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00895
Petitioner:
TERIN RONSON
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
BRYANT v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00897
Petitioner:
TERRY BRYANT
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
CULLITON v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00901
Petitioner:
LINDA C. CULLITON
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
LYON v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00902
Petitioner:
RODNEY LYON
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
ROWE v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00904
Petitioner:
TERESA ROWE
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
BERRY v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00896
Petitioner:
SHERRI BERRY
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Robinson v. McDonough
as 24-1932
Claimant:
TAMERIA R. ROBINSON
Respondent:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
In re: Estech Systems IP, LLC
as 24-1935
Appellant:
In re: ESTECH SYSTEMS IP, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
GANT-FARLEY v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00885
Petitioner:
HELEN GANT-FARLEY
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
BRIGNER v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00889
Petitioner:
GINA BRIGNER
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
