Cases 21 - 30 of 73
Cueto v. US
as 21-1171
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES J. LLOYD, JOHN PARSLEY, BROOKE KEENEY and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Nelson v. Preleski
as 20-2283
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES ROVELLA, Commissioner of the Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection, JAMES L. CETRAN, Chief of the Wethersfield Police Department, in their official capacity, BRIAN PRELESKI, State Attorney for the Judicial District of New Britain Superior Court, in his official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEPHEN DANIEL NELSON
Loveridge v. US
as 19-2090
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OREGON WRITERS COLONY, INC., RICHARD YOUNG, BARBARA L. THOMPSON REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST and others
Plaintiff:
EUGENE HELSER, STEVEN H. WILKINSON, THE ESTATE OF FRANK HARPER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
In re: Publicover
as 19-1883
Appellant:
In re: NELSON GEORGE PUBLICOVER, LEWIS JAMES MARGGRAFF, SPENCER JAMES CONNAUGHTON and others
Appellee:
ANDREI IANCU, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
NELSON et al v. USA
as 1:2016cv08650
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE E. NELSON and MARILYN G. NELSON
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
MENENDEZ et al v. USA
as 1:2017cv01931
Plaintiff:
NELSON MENENDEZ and OSVALDO BORRAS, JR.
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
BRUZOS et al v. USA
as 1:2017cv01408
Plaintiff:
EMILIANO BRUZOS , JAMES A. CAMPBELL , JOSE CASAS and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
CASTILLO v. USA
as 1:2016cv01624
Plaintiff:
REINALDO CASTILLO
Defendant:
USA
Consolidated_plaintiff:
NELSON MENENDEZ and OSVALDO BORRAS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
BANTUM et al v. USA
as 1:2016cv00533
Plaintiff:
JEMILL CHARMAINE BANTUM, TRACY APPLINE, FARUQ I. ROBINSON and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
