Cases 21 - 30 of 42
INGRAM et al v. USA
as 1:2010cv00463
Plaintiff:
CRAIG R. INGRAM , PAULA BELLAMY , E. BRENT COOPER and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
WARD V USPS
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 10-3021
Petitioner:
Thomas O. Ward, Thomas O. Ward, Thomas O. Ward and others
Respondent:
United States Postal Service, United States Postal Service, United States Postal Service and others
WARD V AIR FORCE
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 10-3018
Petitioner:
Bradley A. Ward, Bradley A. Ward, Bradley A. Ward and others
Respondent:
Department of the Air Force, Department of the Air Force, Department of the Air Force and others
BENEDICT V SUPER BAKERY
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 10-1085
Appellee:
Super Bakery, Incorporated, Super Bakery, Incorporated, Super Bakery, Incorporated and others
Appellant:
Ward E. Benedict, Ward E. Benedict, Ward E. Benedict and others
WARD v. USA
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2009cv00513
SANGO INTL V US
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 08-1357
Defendant-Appellee:
Anvil International, Inc., United States and Ward Manufacturing, Inc.
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Sango International L.P.
SANGO INTL V US
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 06-1485
Defendant-Appellee:
Anvil International, Inc., United States and Ward Manufacturing, Inc.
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Sango International L.P.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.