Cases 21 - 30 of 129
City of Fresno v. US
as 22-1994
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CITY OF FRESNO, ARVIN-EDISON WATER STORAGE DISTRICT, CHOWCHILLA WATER DISTRICT and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES, SAN LUIS & DELTA-MENDOTA WATER AUTHORITY, SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT and others
PIERCE v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv00743
Petitioner:
DOUGLAS PIERCE
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
RiggsIn re: Riggs
as 22-1945
Appellant:
In re: GLENN E. RIGGS, JOSEPH J. BAINOR, STANLEY M. BAINOR and others
Appellee:
KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
MAPLES v. USA
as 1:2022cv00623
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS N. MAPLES
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Constantine v. McDonough
as 22-1648
Claimant:
DOUGLAS A. CONSTANTINE
Respondent / Appellee:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
BERMAN v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv00380
Petitioner:
DOUGLAS BERMAN
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Barlow v. US
as 22-1381
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM E. BARLOW, TWILA L. BARLOW, REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES, LLC and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Gates v. DVA
as 22-1156
Petitioner / Appellant:
DOUGLAS L. GATES
Respondent / Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
RiggsIn re: Riggs
as 21-2108
Appellant:
RALPH K. BRECHTER, LOUIS F. INDELICATO, JON L. CLOW and others
Appellee:
ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Whiles v. US
as 21-1405
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VIKKI COSOR PENARRIETA, ANN REED, MARCUS REED and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
