Cases filed in the Federal Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 122
Dawson v. US
as 23-1971
Plaintiff / Appellee: JOE L. DAWSON, CONRAD C. COX, MARY R. COX, Trustees of the Conrad C. Cox Trust No. 1 and the Mary R. Cox Trust No. 1 and others
Defendant / Appellant: UNITED STATES
ADAMS et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv00696
Plaintiff: LEE ADAMS, NEAL AGARWAL, PERI ALKAS and others
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Sheller v. HHS
as 23-1746
Petitioner / Appellant: CHAD SHELLER, as Personal Representative of the estate of DANIEL ELIAS SHELLER
Respondent / Appellee: SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Falzon v. HHS
as 23-1659
Petitioner / Appellant: ADRIENNE FALZON, as legal representative of and administrator of the ESTATE OF PAUL GIACCIO
Respondent / Appellee: SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
BGKEY ESTATE HOLDINGS LLC v. USA
as 1:2022cv01765
Plaintiff: BGKEY ESTATE HOLDINGS LLC
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Luca McDermott Catena Gift Trust v. Hillick & Hobbs Estate, LLC
as 23-1385
Appellant: LUCA MCDERMOTT CATENA GIFT TRUST
Appellee: HILLICK & HOBBS ESTATE, LLC
Smith v. McDonough
as 23-1378
Claimant: THOMAS SMITH, through the representative of his estate, Karen Hicks
Respondent / Appellee: DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Bexar County v. Martin
as 22-2211
Plaintiff / Appellee: BEXAR COUNTY, et al.
Defendant / Appellant: ROWLAND J. MARTIN, JR., as Administrator and Individually as Heir to the Estate of Johnnie Mae King
Smith v. US
as 22-1968
Plaintiff / Appellant: DAVID LEE SMITH, individually and in his capacity as Legal Representative of The Estate of Mary Julia Hook
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES
Darby Development Company, Inc. v. US
as 22-1929
Plaintiff / Appellant: DARBY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC., GWR MANAGEMENT, LLC, MCLEAN INVESTMENTS, LLC and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?