Cases 21 - 30 of 276
ASRC FEDERAL TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, LLC v. USA
as 1:2023cv01738
Plaintiff:
ASRC FEDERAL TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, LLC
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor Defendant:
OSI VISION, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
COUNCIL OF PRISON LOCALS (ALF-CIO) AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, LOCAL 1286, ASHLAND KENTUCKY v. USA
as 1:2023cv01445
Plaintiff:
COUNCIL OF PRISON LOCALS (ALF-CIO) AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, LOCAL 1286, ASHLAND KENTUCKY
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
AEGIS-KK/GARDA WORLD FEDERAL AFRICA v. USA
as 1:2023cv01400
Plaintiff:
AEGIS-KK GARDA WORLD FEDERAL AFRICA
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor Defendant:
G4S KENYA JV
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
HEALTH NET FEDERAL SERVICES, LLC v. USA
as 1:2023cv01268
Plaintiff:
HEALTH NET FEDERAL SERVICES, LLC
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor Defendant:
TRIWEST HEALTHCARE ALLIANCE CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
SIRIUS FEDERAL, LLC v. USA
as 1:2023cv01237
Plaintiff:
SIRIUS FEDERAL, LLC
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
SLS FEDERAL SERVICES, LLC v. USA
as 1:2023cv01240
Plaintiff:
SLS FEDERAL SERVICES, LLC
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
PERATON, INC. v. USA
as 1:2023cv01167
Plaintiff:
PERATON, INC.
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor Defendant:
AVANTUS FEDERAL, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
CDM FEDERAL PROGRAMS CORPORATION v. USA
as 1:2023cv01118
Plaintiff:
CDM FEDERAL PROGRAMS CORPORATION
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor Defendant:
AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
FLUOR FEDERAL SERVICES, INC. v. USA
as 1:2023cv01013
Plaintiff:
FLUOR FEDERAL SERVICES, INC.
Defendant:
USA
Consolidated Plaintiff:
CDM FEDERAL PROGRAMS CORPORATION
Intervenor Defendant:
AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
