Cases 21 - 30 of 262
Smith v. McDonough
as 23-2213
Claimant:
DANIEL R. SMITH
Respondent / Appellee:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
SMITH v. USA
as 1:2023cv01008
Plaintiff:
SHARISSA SMITH
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
LONDON v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv00929
Petitioner:
JACQUELINE LONDON and KEVIN SMITH
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Dawson v. US
as 23-1971
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOE L. DAWSON, CONRAD C. COX, MARY R. COX, Trustees of the Conrad C. Cox Trust No. 1 and the Mary R. Cox Trust No. 1 and others
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES
CREEKSIDE PARK OWNERS' ASSOCIATION et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv00772
Plaintiff:
CREEKSIDE PARK OWNERS' ASSOCIATION, 6TH AND UNION CENTER LLC, COGAN REAL PROPERTY, LLC and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Dawson v. US
as 23-1923
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOE L. DAWSON, CONRAD C. COX, MARY R. COX, Trustees of the Conrad C. Cox Trust No. 1 and the Mary R. Cox Trust No. 1 and others
Plaintiff:
JASON DIAL, TRAVIS DIAL, M. LEE JUENEMANN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Dawson v. US
as 23-1927
Plaintiff:
JOE L. DAWSON, CONRAD C. COX, MARY R. COX, Trustees of the Conrad C. Cox Trust No. 1 and the Mary R. Cox Trust No. 1 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JASON DIAL, TRAVIS DIAL, M. LEE JUENEMANN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Smith v. McDonough
as 23-1749
Claimant:
JOSHUA L. SMITH
Respondent / Appellee:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
SMITH v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv00375
Petitioner:
DIANA SMITH
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023vv00293
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.