Cases filed in the Federal Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 44,969
HAKE v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00905
Petitioner: TIMOTHY HAKE
Respondent: SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
TORRESO v SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00906
Petitioner: LYNN LOUISE TORRESO
Respondent: SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
STRICKLAND v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00912
Petitioner: KATIE STRICKLAND
Respondent: SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
KHEOP v. USA
as 1:2024cv00911
Plaintiff: MICHAEL ABDULLAH KHEOP, Michael Cosby and Michael E. Johnson
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals of New York, LLC
as 24-1936
Plaintiff: TEVA BRANDED PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS R&D, INC., NORTON (WATERFORD) LTD. and TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.
Defendant: AMNEAL PHARMACEUTICALS OF NEW YORK, LLC, AMNEAL IRELAND LTD., AMNEAL PHARMACEUTICALS LLC and others
Baroque Timber Industries (Zhongshan) Co., Ltd. et al v. United States
as 1:2024cv00106
Plaintiff: Baroque Timber Industries (Zhongshan) Co., Ltd. and Riverside Plywood Corporation
Defendant: United States
BLACKWELL v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv01075
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
SHOGREN v. USA
as 1:2024cv00877
Plaintiff: DENNIS SHOGREN
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
HILL v. USA
as 1:2024cv00883
Plaintiff: LISA MICHELLE HILL
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Chrustowski v. USPS
as 24-1928
Petitioner: RENEE ANNETTE CHRUSTOWSKI
Respondent: UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?