Cases 31 - 40 of 1,170
TWEEDEL et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv01184
Plaintiff:
KIM TWEEDEL, MARYURY POWELL, PAUL POWELL and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS SALES & SERVICES CORPORATION v. USA
as 1:2023cv01135
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS SALES & SERVICES CORPORATION
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor Defendant:
SOLUTION TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS D/B/A PLURIBUS DIGITAL (FLASHY-BIOMETRICS CTA)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
SYNEREN TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION v. USA
as 1:2023cv01099
Plaintiff:
SYNEREN TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor Defendant:
ITC-DE, LLC D/B/A DOTIT and NETCENTRIC TECHNOLOGY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
SYNEREN TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION v. USA
as 1:2023cv01112
Plaintiff:
SYNEREN TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor Defendant:
ITC-DE, LLC, D/B/A DOTIT, RIVA SOLUTIONS, INC., BRIGHTPOINT, LLC and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
CAN SOFTTECH, INC., EKAGRA PARTNERS, LLC, JCS SOLUTIONS LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
ACCELGOV, LLC v. USA
as 1:2023cv01079
Plaintiff:
ACCELGOV, LLC and ENVISION UNLIMITED SOLUTIONS, LLC
Defendant:
USA
Consolidated Plaintiff:
SYSTEMS PLUS, INC.
Intervenor Defendant:
ITC-DE, LLC D/B/A DOTIT, A1FEDIMPACT, LLC, NETCENTRIC TECHNOLOGY, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
ALFORD et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv01039
Plaintiff:
RICHARD B. ALFORD, KATHLEEN A. ALFORD, DONNA MARIE BREAULT and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Alberty v. McDonough
as 23-1976
Claimant:
CHRISTINE B. ALBERTY
Respondent / Appellee:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Arnold v. US
as 23-1951
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ARNOLD, SUSAN BOLEK, H. DRAKE GEBHARD and others
Plaintiff:
B&D FARMS, INC., H. KENT EUHUS LIVING TRUST, DIANA EUHUS LIVING TRUST and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
