Cases 31 - 40 of 51
LAWLER MFG CO V BRADLEY CORP
as 07-1533
Defendant-Appellee:
Bradley Corporation
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Lawler Manufacturing Co., Inc.
CASITAS MUNICIPAL WATER V US
as 07-5153
Amicus Curiae:
A. Dan Tarlock, Adell Amos, Alexandra Klass and others
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Casitas Municipal Water District
Defendant-Appellee:
United States
ADAIR V US
as 06-5077
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Alan Thomason, Alfredo Arias, Allen Edenfield and others
Defendant-Appellee:
United States
FISHERMAN'S HARVEST V PBS & J
as 06-1208
Plaintiff-Appellant:
ALTON LEE KELLY, C. JOE NELSON, JR., CHILDRESS SEAFOOD, INC. and others
Defendant:
BERTUCCI CONTRACTING CORPORATION, LUHR BROTHERS, INC., PBS & J (formerly known as Espey, Huston & Associates, Inc.) and others
Defendant-Appellee:
BRADLEY INDUSTRIAL TEXTILES, INC., NICOLON CORPORATION (also known as Ten Cate Nicolon), BRADLEY INDUSTRIAL TEXTILES, INC. and others
Third Party Defendant-Appellee:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff-Appellee:
WEEKS MARINE, INC., WEEKS MARINE, INC. and WEEKS MARINE, INC.
FOREST GLEN PROPERTIES, LLC, v. USA
as 1:2005cv01006
Plaintiff:
FOREST GLEN PROPERTIES, LLC, , MARK B. MAREIN and STEVEN L. BRADLEY
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
BRADLEY V DVA
as 05-7192
Claimant-Appellant:
DENNIS F. BRADLEY
Respondent-Appellee:
R. JAMES NICHOLSON, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
BALBOA INSTRUMENTS V SPA BUILDERS
as 05-1583
Defendant-Appellee:
ANTHEM SWITCHING PRODUCTS, INC., GARY NUGENT and WALT BRADLEY
Defendant/Cross Appellant:
SPA BUILDERS SUPPORT GROUP
BALBOA INSTRUMENTS V SPA BUILDERS
as 05-1564
Defendant-Appellee:
ANTHEM SWITCHING PRODUCTS, INC., DAVID MCCLURE, DAVID STOKES and others
Plaintiff-Appellant:
BALBOA INSTRUMENTS, INC.
Defendant/Cross Appellant:
SPA BUILDERS SUPPORT GROUP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
