Cases 31 - 40 of 58
BISHOP et al
as 1:2010cv00594
Plaintiff:
SCOTT BISHOP , JAN BISHOP , LARRY JR. CARNEY and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
IN RE RIGGS
as 10-1320
Appellant:
Alan D. Shollenberger, Amy Daley, Donald H. Mueller and others
Appellee:
David J. Kappos, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, David J. Kappos, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, David J. Kappos, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and others
NILSEN v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2010vv00110
Petitioner:
GLENN NILSEN
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
GLENN V DVA
as 10-7027
Respondent-Appellee:
Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs and others
Claimant-Appellant:
Nathan L. Glenn, Nathan L. Glenn, Nathan L. Glenn and others
THERASENSE V BECTON
as 08-1511
Amicus Curiae:
1st Media, LLC, Acacia Research Corporation, Alejandro Martinez and others
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Abbott Laboratories and TheraSense, Inc. (n/k/a Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc.)
Defendant-Appellee:
Bayer HealthCare LLC, Becton, Dickinson and Company and Nova Biomedical Corporation
PIVONKA V AXELROD
as 08-1413
Appellee:
Glenn Axelrod and Walter Lee
Appellant:
John Tottleben and Scott Pivonka
CLOCK SPRING V WRAPMASTER
as 08-1332
Defendant-Appellee:
Applied Consultants, Inc., Glenn Davis (personally and including his marital estate) and Wrapmaster, Inc.
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Clock Spring, L.P.
BARBER V DVA
as 08-7105
Claimant-Appellant:
Glenn Barber
Respondent-Appellee:
James B. Peake, M.D., Secretary of Veterans Affairs
HALL et al v. USA
as 1:2007cv00773
Plaintiff:
LOUISE HALL and GLENN GOULD
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
WINUK V US
as 07-5158
Plaintiff-Appellee:
Seymour Winuk, (individually as the father of Glenn Winuk, Deceased)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
