Cases 31 - 40 of 57
VINCULUM SOLUTIONS, INC. v. USA
as 1:2013cv00364
Plaintiff:
VINCULUM SOLUTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor_defendant:
BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON, INC.
HAMILTON v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2011vv00476
Petitioner:
BUEL DEAN HAMILTON
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
Type:
Other Statutes
BRIGHT V US
as 10-1385
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Brady J. Stuart, Clarence Forkner, Debbie M. Hamilton and others
Defendant-Appellee:
United States, United States, United States and others
BRIGHT V US
as 09-5048
Amicus Curiae:
Albert J. Robison, Baley Trotman Farms, Byrne Brothers and others
Plaintiff-Appellant:
B. Lorene Soper, Brady J. Stuart, Clarence Forkner and others
Defendant-Appellee:
United States
BAER V US
as 08-5165
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Carol Struiksma, Dimitri Theodorou, Elvin D. Bittner and others
Defendant-Appellee:
United States
THERASENSE V BECTON
as 08-1511
Amicus Curiae:
1st Media, LLC, Acacia Research Corporation, Alejandro Martinez and others
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Abbott Laboratories and TheraSense, Inc. (n/k/a Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc.)
Defendant-Appellee:
Bayer HealthCare LLC, Becton, Dickinson and Company and Nova Biomedical Corporation
FEMME COMP INC. v. USA
as 1:2008cv00409
Plaintiff:
FEMME COMP INC.
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor_defendant:
SAVANTAGE FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. and BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON, INC.
Consolidated_plaintiff:
TECHNICAL AND PROJECT ENGINEERING, LLC , DATA SYSTEMS ANALYSTS, INC. , L-3 SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
SYSTEMS DIVISION V TEKNEK
as 08-1099
Defendant-Appellant:
Jonathan Kennett, Sheila Hamilton, Teknek Holdings, Ltd. and others
Plaintiff-Appellee:
Systems Division, Inc.
SYSTEMS DIVISION V TEKNEK
as 07-1162
Defendant-Appellant:
Jonathan Kennett, Sheila Hamilton and Teknek Holdings, Ltd.
Plaintiff-Appellee:
Systems Division, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.