Cases 41 - 50 of 104
KANSAS CITY POWER & LIGHT CO. v. USA
as 1:2015cv00348
Plaintiff:
KANSAS CITY POWER & LIGHT CO.
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
KANSAS CITY POWER & LIGHT COMPANY v. USA
as 1:2013cv00086
Plaintiff:
KANSAS CITY POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
Defendant:
USA
CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY et al
as 1:2011cv00869
Plaintiff:
CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY and FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
PATRIOT TAXIWAY INDUSTRIES, INC. v. USA
as 1:2011cv00124
Plaintiff:
PATRIOT TAXIWAY INDUSTRIES, INC.
Defendant:
USA
Movant:
TACTICAL LIGHTING SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
KANSAS GAS & ELECTRIC CO V US
as 11-5044
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Kansas City Power & Light Company, Kansas Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. and Kansas Gas and Electric Company
Defendant/Cross Appellant:
United States
ALMOND BROS LUMBER V US
as 10-1389
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Almond Bros. Lumber Co., Bighorn Lumber Company, Blue Mountain Lumber Products, LLC and others
Defendant-Appellee:
Ron Kirk, United States Trade Representative, United States, Ron Kirk, United States Trade Representative and others
B-K LIGHTING V FRESNO VALVES
as 10-1135
Plaintiff-Appellant:
B-K Lighting, Inc., B-K Lighting, Inc., B-K Lighting, Inc. and others
Defendant-Appellee:
Fresno Valves & Castings, Inc., Fresno Valves & Castings, Inc., Fresno Valves & Castings, Inc. and others
NILSSEN V UNIVERSAL LIGHTING
as 09-1268
Plaintiff-Appellee:
GEO Foundation, Ltd. and Ole K. Nilssen
GEO Foundation, Ltd:
Defendant-Appellant:
Universal Lighting Technologies, Inc.
INTERACTIVE HEALTH V KING KONG USA
as 09-1141
Defendant/Cross Appellant:
American Lighting Industry, Inc., Bernard Koay, King Kong USA, Inc. and others
Defendant-Appellee:
Blair Hayes
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Daito Dengki Kogyu KK (dba Daito Electric Machine Industry) and Interactive Health LLC (n/k/a Human Touch LLC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
