Cases 51 - 60 of 1,225
WHITNEY et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv00946
Plaintiff:
MELINDA WHITNEY, KIMBERLY G. GRIFFIN, PATRICK G. JACKSON and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
NICHOLSON et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv00843
Plaintiff:
DANIEL S. NICHOLSON and PATRICIA E. MIDGETT
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Dawson v. US
as 23-1971
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOE L. DAWSON, CONRAD C. COX, MARY R. COX, Trustees of the Conrad C. Cox Trust No. 1 and the Mary R. Cox Trust No. 1 and others
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES
DACH et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv00796
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL M. DACH, PATRICIA A. DACH, MICHAEL E. KALLMEYER and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
BearBox LLC v. Lancium LLC
as 23-1922
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BEARBOX LLC and AUSTIN STORMS
Defendant / Appellee:
LANCIUM LLC, MICHAEL T. MCNAMARA and RAYMOND E. CLINE, JR.
Dawson v. US
as 23-1927
Plaintiff:
JOE L. DAWSON, CONRAD C. COX, MARY R. COX, Trustees of the Conrad C. Cox Trust No. 1 and the Mary R. Cox Trust No. 1 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JASON DIAL, TRAVIS DIAL, M. LEE JUENEMANN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Dawson v. US
as 23-1923
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOE L. DAWSON, CONRAD C. COX, MARY R. COX, Trustees of the Conrad C. Cox Trust No. 1 and the Mary R. Cox Trust No. 1 and others
Plaintiff:
JASON DIAL, TRAVIS DIAL, M. LEE JUENEMANN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Pieksza v. McDonough
as 23-1874
Claimant:
MICHAEL E. PIEKSZA
Respondent / Appellee:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
100 M. STREET LLC et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv00690
Plaintiff:
100 M. STREET LLC., JAMES A. BECKER, PATRICIA L. CAMBIANICA and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
DiCicco v. US
as 23-1859
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NICHOLAS J. DICICCO, CARL E. MALM, GALE M. NELSON and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
