Cases 51 - 60 of 1,001
LEVY et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv01466
Plaintiff:
JAMES M. LEVY, ESTATE OF RAQUEL LEVY, LAUREN R. SMOKE and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Pen Pal, LLCIn re: Pen Pal, LLC
as 23-2332
Appellant:
In re: PEN PAL, LLC
Appellee:
KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
RAFALSKA et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv01433
Plaintiff:
JANINA RAFALSKA, ROBYN K. RASCH, JONATHAN C. INABA and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Strongbridge Dublin Ltd.In re: Strongbridge Dublin Ltd.
as 23-2302
Appellant:
In re: STRONGBRIDGE DUBLIN LTD.
Appellee:
KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
RYAN et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv01371
Plaintiff:
LYNN RYAN, WEST BAYOU OAKS TOWNHOMES CENTRAL ASSOCIATION, INC., TIMOTHY DARWIN TWINING and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Strongbridge Dublin Ltd.In re: Strongbridge Dublin Ltd.
as 23-2303
Appellant:
In re: STRONGBRIDGE DUBLIN LTD.
Appellee:
KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
PenIn re: Pen
as 23-2282
Appellant:
In re: THE PEN
Appellee:
KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
ABUGATTAS et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv01239
Plaintiff:
VIRGINIA ABUGATTAS, ELIZABETH ANDERSON, WILLIAM BARRY and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
FRY et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv01216
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA FRY, CHRISTOPHER S. GILL, BROOKE A. GILL and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Beavis v. US
as 23-2222
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT L. BEAVIS, EUGENE R. BISCAILUZ, ALAN G. CHESTERMAN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
