Cases 51 - 60 of 1,002
PSIP LLCIn re: PSIP LLC
as 24-1001
Appellant:
In re: PSIP LLC
Appellee:
KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Beavis v. US
as 23-2222
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT L. BEAVIS, EUGENE R. BISCAILUZ, ALAN G. CHESTERMAN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
FloydIn re: Floyd
as 23-2395
Appellant:
In re: BONNIE IRIS MCDONALD FLOYD
Appellee:
KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
ButlerIn re: Butler
as 23-2380
Appellant:
In re: JOHN ROBERT BUTLER and STULLER, INC.
Appellee:
KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
HOFFMAN et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv01146
Plaintiff:
BRENDA K. HOFFMAN, FRANCIS JOSEPH HOFFMAN and BRENDA K. MUNDY
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Wonge v. McDonough
as 23-2355
Claimant:
DAVID K. WONGE
Respondent / Appellee:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
LEVY et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv01466
Plaintiff:
JAMES M. LEVY, ESTATE OF RAQUEL LEVY, LAUREN R. SMOKE and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
McLeayIn re: McLeay
as 23-2338
Appellant:
In re: MATTHEW MCLEAY
Appellee:
KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
RAFALSKA et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv01433
Plaintiff:
JANINA RAFALSKA, ROBYN K. RASCH, JONATHAN C. INABA and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Pen Pal, LLCIn re: Pen Pal, LLC
as 23-2332
Appellant:
In re: PEN PAL, LLC
Appellee:
KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
