Cases 61 - 70 of 201
FARNSWORTH v. USA
as 1:2012cv00259
Plaintiff:
CHARLES V. FARNSWORTH
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
HUCKSAM v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2011vv00907
Petitioner:
HELEN V HUCKSAM
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
Type:
Other Statutes
SIEBEN v. USA
as 1:2011cv00878
SWINDLER v. USA
as 1:2011cv00612
Plaintiff:
PETER V. SWINDLER and BETTY B. SWINDLER
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
WILLIAM V. WALSH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. v. USA
as 1:2011cv00594
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM V. WALSH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
WEBER et al v. USA
as 1:2011cv00338
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM P. WEBER , ALBERT ACOSTA , CORY R. ACOSTA and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
DAVIS et al v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2011vv00156
Petitioner:
ROBERT V DAVIS , AMY M PHILLIPS and AIDAN L DAVIS
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
Type:
Other Statutes
KNIGHT V. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD
as 11-3002
Petitioner:
Candice V. Knight, Candice V. Knight, Candice V. Knight and others
Respondent:
Department of Homeland Security, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Homeland Security and others
Merit Systems Protection Board:
, , and others
DAVIS V. SHINSEKI
as 11-7063
Respondent-Appellee:
Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs and Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Claimant-Appellant:
Harold V. Davis and Harold V. Davis
PATHAK V. SHINSEKI.
as 11-7029
Respondent-Appellee:
Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs and Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Claimant-Appellant:
Kieron V. Pathak and Kieron V. Pathak
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
