Cases 71 - 80 of 559
Kriner v. McDonough
as 21-2076
Respondent / Appellee:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Claimant:
HARRIET H. KRINER
Khan v. Hemosphere Inc.
as 19-1952
Defendant:
F. NOEL PARENT, EARL SCHUMAN, KAUTILYA MEHTA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
LARRY D. FLANAGAN, JONATHAN R. MOLNAR, SHEPPARD MONDY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NAZIR KHAN and IFTIKHAR KHAN
Sharrock v. US
as 21-1889
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHIL S. KO, XUECHEN ZHANG, HYUNIL JO LEE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Koopmann v. US
as 21-1746
Plaintiff:
EUGENE R. BISCAILUZ, JAMES H. BIESTEK, ROBERT L. BEAVIS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM ROYALL, JR.
Baker v. McDonough
as 21-1863
Respondent / Appellee:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Claimant:
RICHARD H. BAKER
Bonner v. McDonough
as 21-1817
Claimant:
MARK H. BONNER
Respondent / Appellee:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Haggart v. US
as 21-1658
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA STRANG, TWOSONS LLC, WESTPOINT PROPERTIES, LLC, C/O FARAMARZ GHODDOUSSI and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STAR L. EVANS and STAR EVANS
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Haggart v. US
as 21-1659
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CLEVELAND SQUARE, LLC, GRETCHEN CHAMBERS, ALISON L. WEBB and others
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Haggart v. US
as 21-1660
Plaintiff:
KELLY J. SATHER, PATRICIA STRANG, TWOSONS LLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENISE LYNN WOODLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Haggart v. US
as 21-1684
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WESTPOINT PROPERTIES, LLC, C/O FARAMARZ GHODDOUSSI, KATHY HAGGART, Husband and Wife, For Themselves and As Representatives of a Class of Similarly Situated Persons, WILLIAM AMES and others
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA STRANG, TWOSONS LLC, GORDON ARTHUR WOODLEY, Personal Counsel for Kittinger Deed Claimants and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
