Cases 1 - 10 of 14
LEVY et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv01466
Plaintiff:
JAMES M. LEVY, ESTATE OF RAQUEL LEVY, LAUREN R. SMOKE and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
BARTON et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv00444
Plaintiff:
LESTER BARTON and BRENDA BARTON
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
BARTON v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv00724
Petitioner:
EILEEN BARTON
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Ahanchian v. US
as 21-1398
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOUGLAS B. DOUGHERTY, CAROLINE CORBETT, JACK KELLEY and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
BARTON MALOW CO. v. USA
as 1:2010cv00188
Plaintiff:
BARTON MALOW CO.
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
ADAMS et al v. USA
as 1:2010cv00060
Plaintiff:
LISA ADAMS , CHRISTIN ALLAMAN-JONES , GLORIA ALLEN and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Torts - Injury
PROPAT INTL V RPOST INC
as 06-1270
Defendant/Cross Appellant:
Kenneth Barton, Terrance Tomkow, Zafar Khan and others
Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant:
Propat International Corp., Propat International Corp. and Propat International Corp.
Defendant/Counterclaimant-Cross Appellant:
RPost US, Inc., RPost, Inc., RPost US, Inc. and others
PROPAT INTL V RPOST INC
as 06-1222
Defendant/Cross Appellant:
Kenneth Barton, RPost International Limited, Terrance Tomkow and others
Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant:
Propat International Corp., Propat International Corp. and Propat International Corp.
Defendant/Counterclaimant-Cross Appellant:
RPost US, Inc., RPost, Inc., RPost US, Inc. and others
PROPAT INTL V RPOST INC
as 06-1223
Defendant/Cross Appellant:
Kenneth Barton, Kenneth Barton and Kenneth Barton
AHRENS V US
as 06-5020
Plaintiff-Appellant:
DANIEL R. VERLEY, DONALD C. OLSON, EDWARD L. SLIVKA and others
Defendant-Appellee:
UNITED STATES, UNITED STATES and UNITED STATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
