Cases 1 - 10 of 33
DAVID & KAREN BROWN REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv01993
Plaintiff:
DAVID & KAREN BROWN REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST, GAIL C. JOHANNSEN-BRIDGE REVOCABLE TRUST, JANE A. LARSON and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Golden Bridge Industries Pte. Ltd. v. United States
as 1:2023cv00173
Plaintiff:
Golden Bridge Industries Pte. Ltd.
Defendant:
United States
Bridges v. McDonough
as 23-2207
Claimant:
WILLIE L. BRIDGES
Respondent / Appellee:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1In re: Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1
as 23-2103
Appellant:
In re: GODO KAISHA IP BRIDGE 1
Appellee:
KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
BRIDGES v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv00329
Petitioner:
CHARLOTTE J. BRIDGES
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
BRIDGES v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv01881
Petitioner:
MICHELLE BRIDGES
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Life Bridge International Corp. v. United States
as 1:2022cv00260
Plaintiff:
LifeBridge International Corp and Life Bridge International Corp.
Defendant:
United States
Darby Development Company, Inc. v. US
as 22-1929
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARBY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC., GWR MANAGEMENT, LLC, MCLEAN INVESTMENTS, LLC and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
BRIDGES v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv00376
Petitioner:
KATHRYN GRACE BRIDGES
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
BRIDGES et al v. USA
as 1:2022cv00170
Plaintiff:
WENDY WALKER FREEMAN BRIDGES and RICHARD H. ROBERTS
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
