Cases filed in the Federal Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 126
Anklam v. HHS
as 24-2161
Petitioner: KAREN ANKLAM, as the legal representatives of the estate of their daughter, N.A., deceased and BRIAN ANKLAM
Respondent: SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Estate Of Albert P. Schultz v. US
as 24-2131
Defendant: UNITED STATES
Plaintiff: BONNIE SCHULTZ, Representative and ESTATE OF ALBERT P. SCHULTZ, by
Jones v. US
as 24-2053
Plaintiff: ESTATE OF ARDEN POST, UTE INDIAN TRIBE OF THE UINTAH AND OURAY RESERVATION, ARDEN C. POST, individually and as natural parent of Todd R. Murray and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES
JUNG v. USA
as 1:2024cv00931
Plaintiff: ESTATE OF JOHN R. JUNG
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 Tucker Act
Chinook Landing, LLC v. US
as 24-1884
Plaintiff: CHINOOK LANDING, LLC, as personal representative of the Estate of John Lund
Defendant: JOHN DOES, 1-15 and UNITED STATES
Pressly v. US
as 24-1823
Plaintiff: ROBERT A. PRESSLY, 8599 CAR LOT, LLC, DIANE M. AKERS and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES
Receivership Estate of AudienceScience Inc. v. Google LLC
as 24-1825
Plaintiff: REVITALIZATION PARTNERS, LLC, As General Receiver for The Receivership Estate of AudienceScience Inc. and THE RECEIVERSHIP ESTATE OF AUDIENCESCIENCE INC.
Defendant: YOUTUBE LLC and GOOGLE LLC
Burger v. US We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 24-1249
Plaintiff / Appellee: BASIL AGAPION, SOPHIA S. AGAPION, KATHE BURGER and others
Plaintiff: GUILFORD BUILDERS SUPPLY CO.
Defendant / Appellant: UNITED STATES
Chapman Spring/Garden, LLC v. US
as 24-1250
Plaintiff / Appellee: CHAPMAN SPRING/GARDEN, LLC, CHANEY-FRYE #4, LLC, D.S. CHANEY PROPERTIES #6, LLC and others
Defendant / Appellant: UNITED STATES
Sullivan v. OPM
as 24-1096
Petitioner: NANCY SULLIVAN, Executor of the Estate of John V. Sullivan
Respondent: OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?