Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Kutt v. Apple Inc.
as 20-1757
Defendant / Appellee:
ASUSTEK COMPUTER INC., NVIDIA CORPORATION, NOKIA CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MERS KUTT
FUJITSU LIMITED V NETGEAR
as 10-1045
Amicus Curiae:
Association of Corporate Counsel, Association of Corporate Counsel, Association of Corporate Counsel and others
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Fujitsu Limited, LG Electronics, Inc., U.S. Philips Corporation and others
Defendant-Appellee:
Netgear, Inc., Netgear, Inc., Netgear, Inc. and others
Netgear, Inc:
, , and others
TYPHOON TOUCH V DELL INC
as 09-1589
Defendant-Appellee:
Apple Inc., Dell, Inc., Fujitsu America, Inc. and others
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Typhoon Touch Technologies, Inc.
Typhoon Touch Technologies, Inc:
COMPETITIVE TECHNOLOGIES V FUJITSU
as 05-1237
Defendant-Appellee:
FUJITSU GENERAL AMERICA, INC., FUJITSU GENERAL LIMITED, FUJITSU HITACHI PLASMA DISPLAY LIMITED and others
Plaintiff-Appellant:
THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS
FUJITSU AMERICA V US
as 05-1031
Plaintiff-Appellant:
FUJITSU AMERICA, INC. and FUJITSU IT HOLDINGS, INC. (now Fujitsu Computer Systems Corporation)
Defendant-Appellee:
UNITED STATES
DYNACORE HOLDINGS V US PHILIPS
as 03-1305
Defendant-Appellee:
ADAPTEC, INC., ADS TECHNOLOGIES, INC., AGERE SYSTEMS INC. and others
Plaintiff-Appellant:
DYNACORE HOLDINGS CORPORATION and DYNACORE PATENT LITIGATION TRUST
Defendant:
U.S. PHILIPS CORPORATION
COMPETITIVE TECHNOL V FUJITSU LTD
as 03-1380
Plaintiff-Appellant:
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS
Defendant-Appellee:
FUJITSU HITACHI PLASMA DISPLAY LIMITED and FUJITSU LIMITED
FUJITSU COMPOUND SEMICONDUCTOR V US
as 03-1293
Plaintiff-Appellant:
FUJITSU COMPOUND SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.
Defendant-Appellee:
UNITED STATES
FUJITSU GENERAL AMERICA V US
as 01-1042
Plaintiff-Appellant:
FUJITSU GENERAL AMERICA, INC., FUJITSU GENERAL AMERICA, INC. and FUJITSU GENERAL AMERICA, INC.
Defendant-Appellee:
UNITED STATES, UNITED STATES and UNITED STATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
