Cases 1 - 10 of 179
DOMBROWSKI v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00741
Petitioner:
DENNIS DOMBROWSKI, II
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
THUNDERYARD LIBERTY JV II, LLC v. USA
as 1:2024cv00547
Plaintiff:
THUNDERYARD LIBERTY JV II, LLC
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
LBT IP II LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
as 24-1526
Appellant:
LBT IP II LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Beckman Coulter, Inc. v. Sirigen II Limited
as 24-1512
Appellant:
BECKMAN COULTER, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
SIRIGEN II LIMITED
ABC Corporation I v. Partnership And Unincorporated Associations
as 24-1471
Plaintiff:
ABC CORPORATION I, ABC CORPORATION II, EBAY, INC. and others
Defendant:
THE PARTNERSHIP AND UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE "A", GYROOR US, TOMOLOO OFFICIAL and others
Respondent:
YANJIN-US
Hangzhou Chic Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. v. Partnership And Unincorporated Associations
as 24-1472
Plaintiff:
ABC CORPORATION I, ABC CORPORATION II, EBAY, INC. and others
Defendant:
THE PARTNERSHIP AND UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE "A", GYROOR US, TOMOLOO OFFICIAL and others
Respondent:
YANJIN-US
LBT IP II LLC v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
as 24-1457
Appellant:
LBT IP II LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
BRIMMER v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00194
Petitioner:
WILLIAM BRIMMER, II
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
ROLAND PROPERTIES II, AN OKLAHOMA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP v. USA
as 1:2023cv02187
Plaintiff:
ROLAND PROPERTIES II, AN OKLAHOMA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
BLAND et al
as 1:2023cv01729
Plaintiff:
DANIEL BLAND, JOHN AGUZZI, ARRINGTON FARMS, INC. and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
