Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Fine Furniture (Shanghai) Ltd. v. US
as 19-1500
Plaintiff:
NAKAHIRO JYOU SEI FURNITURE (DALIAN) CO., LTD., DUNHUA CITY WANRONG WOOD INDUSTRY CO., LTD., FINE FURNITURE (SHANGHAI) LIMITED and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONGTAI FUAN UNIVERSAL DYNAMICS, LLC, BENXI WOOD COMPANY, LINYI YOUYOU WOOD CO., LTD. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Fine Furniture (Shanghai) Ltd. v. US
as 19-1499
Plaintiff:
CHANGZHOU HAWD FLOORING CO., LTD., YINGYI-NATURE (KUNSHAN) WOOD INDUSTRY CO., LTD., DALIAN HUILONG WOODEN PRODUCTS CO., LTD. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NAKAHIRO JYOU SEI FURNITURE (DALIAN) CO., LTD., MUDANJIANG BOSEN WOOD INDUSTRY CO., LTD., OLD MASTER PRODUCTS, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Fine Furniture (Shanghai) Ltd. v. US
as 19-1501
Plaintiff:
ANHUI LONGHUA BAMBOO PRODUCT CO., LTD., NAKAHIRO JYOU SEI FURNITURE (DALIAN) CO., LTD., DUNHUA CITY WANRONG WOOD INDUSTRY CO., LTD. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARMSTRONG WOOD PRODUCTS (KUNSHAN) CO., LTD.
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Fine Furniture (Shanghai) Ltd. v. US
as 19-1503
Plaintiff:
ANHUI LONGHUA BAMBOO PRODUCT CO., LTD., NAKAHIRO JYOU SEI FURNITURE (DALIAN) CO., LTD., DUNHUA CITY WANRONG WOOD INDUSTRY CO., LTD. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FINE FURNITURE (SHANGHAI) LIMITED
Fine Furniture (Shanghai) Ltd. v. US
as 19-1502
Plaintiff:
ANHUI LONGHUA BAMBOO PRODUCT CO., LTD., FINE FURNITURE (SHANGHAI) LIMITED, CHANGZHOU HAWD FLOORING CO., LTD. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NAKAHIRO JYOU SEI FURNITURE (DALIAN) CO., LTD., MUDANJIANG BOSEN WOOD INDUSTRY CO., LTD., JILIN FOREST INDUSTRY JINQIAO FLOORING GROUP CO., LTD. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
WAMBACH et al v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2012vv00710
Petitioner:
PAT WAMBACH , KATE WAMBACH and KARLY WAMBACH
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
