Cases 1 - 9 of 9
PARSLEY v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv02138
Petitioner:
LOWELL PARSLEY
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
LUTZ et al
as 1:2023cv00449
Plaintiff:
LOWELL LUTZ and CYNTHIA LUTZ
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Glover v. Cohen
as 21-2126
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MORRIS S. GLOVER
Defendant / Appellee:
DANIEL E. COHEN, BRUCE E. JOHNSON, SUZANNE KAMEESE and others
Defendant:
LOWELL FRENCH
Big Oak Farms, Inc. v. US
as 19-1748
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAURA B. MEEK FOR JANET BONDURANT Q-TIP TRUST, SAMMIE L. PONDER, LESLIE FOX FARMS, L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
MARTY HUTCHISON, TERRY HEQUENBOURG, BURKE LAND CO. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
FERGUSON et al v. USA
as 1:2014cv00224
Plaintiff:
LOWELL G. FERGUSON and XIOMARA FERGUSON
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
IN RE JUNG
as 10-1019
Amicus Curiae:
Constellation Law Group PLLC, Electronic Inventory Solutions, Inc., Ellen M. Bierman and others
Appellee:
David J. Kappos, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, David J. Kappos, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, David J. Kappos, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and others
David J. Kappos, Director, U.S. Patent And Trademark Office:
, , and others
Appellant:
Edward K. Y. Jung, Lowell L. Wood, Jr., Edward K. Y. Jung and others
MCCLELLAN V DVA
as 06-7226
Claimant-Appellee:
Lowell Mcclellan
Respondent-Appellant:
R. James Nicholson, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
BAUM RESEARCH V UNIV OF MASS
as 06-1330
Plaintiff-Appellee:
Baum Research and Development Company, Inc. and Charles S. Baum
Defendant-Appellant:
University of Massachusetts at Lowell
LOWELL INTL V QUIMBY
as 02-1392
Appellant:
LOWELL INTERNATIONAL COMPANY
Appellee:
WILLIAM S. QUIMBY
WILLIAM S. QUIMBY:
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
