Cases 1 - 10 of 1,814
Edsal Manufacturing Co., Ltd. v. United States
as 1:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Edsal Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
Defendant:
United States
BARBOUR COUNTY ASSOCIATES, LTD. v. USA
as 1:2022cv19231
Plaintiff:
BARBOUR COUNTY ASSOCIATES, LTD.
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 Tucker Act
Google LLC v. Valtrus Innovations Ltd.
as 24-1945
Appellant:
GOOGLE LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
VALTRUS INNOVATIONS LTD.
Baroque Timber Industries (Zhongshan) Co., Ltd. et al v. United States
as 1:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Baroque Timber Industries (Zhongshan) Co., Ltd. and Riverside Plywood Corporation
Defendant:
United States
Giti Tire Global Trading Pte. Ltd. et al v. United States
as 1:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Giti Tire Global Trading Pte. Ltd., Giti Radial Tire (Anhui) Company Ltd. and Giti Tire (Fujian) Company Ltd.
Defendant:
United States
Intervenor:
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union
Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals of New York, LLC
as 24-1936
Plaintiff:
TEVA BRANDED PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS R&D, INC., NORTON (WATERFORD) LTD. and TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.
Defendant:
AMNEAL PHARMACEUTICALS OF NEW YORK, LLC, AMNEAL IRELAND LTD., AMNEAL PHARMACEUTICALS LLC and others
Staton Techiya, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
as 24-1917
Plaintiff:
STATON TECHIYA, LLC
Defendant:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. G+ Communications, LLC
as 24-1902
Appellant:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
Defendant / Appellee:
G+ COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
Technology in Ariscale, LLC v. Razer USA Ltd.
as 24-1657
Plaintiff:
TECHNOLOGY IN ARISCALE, LLC
Defendant:
RAZER USA LTD.
Wind Tower Trade Coalition v. United States
as 1:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Wind Tower Trade Coalition
Defendant:
United States
Intervenor:
Dongkuk S&C Co., Ltd.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
