Cases 1 - 10 of 74
Applied Predictive Technologies, Inc. v. MarketDial, Inc.
as 24-1805
Plaintiff:
APPLIED PREDICTIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Defendant:
MARKETDIAL, INC., JOHN M. STODDARD, aka Johnny Stoddard and MORGAN DAVIS
Applied Predictive Technologies, Inc. v. MarketDial, Inc.
as 24-1751
Plaintiff:
APPLIED PREDICTIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Defendant:
MARKETDIAL, INC., JOHN M. STODDARD, aka Johnny Stoddard and MORGAN DAVIS
Burger v. US
as 24-1249
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BASIL AGAPION, SOPHIA S. AGAPION, KATHE BURGER and others
Plaintiff:
GUILFORD BUILDERS SUPPLY CO.
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Chapman Spring/Garden, LLC v. US
as 24-1250
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHAPMAN SPRING/GARDEN, LLC, CHANEY-FRYE #4, LLC, D.S. CHANEY PROPERTIES #6, LLC and others
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES
MCCOY v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv01954
Petitioner:
MORGAN MCCOY
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
RozmanIn re: Rozman
as 24-1063
Appellant:
In re: MEGAN ROZMAN, MELANIE ROZMAN, MORGAN ROZMAN and others
Appellee:
KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Collier v. Trump
as 23-2420
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IRINA COLLIER, and for all similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
DONALD J. TRUMP, GOVERNOR OF CA NEWSOME, GOVERNOR OF FL and others
KIRBY v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv00895
Petitioner:
MORGAN KIRBY
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
MORGAN v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv01311
Petitioner:
MARY MORGAN
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
MORGAN v. USA
as 1:2022cv01090
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MORGAN
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
