Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Applied Biokinetics LLC v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
as 22-2038
Plaintiff / Appellant:
APPLIED BIOKINETICS LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
CVS PHARMACY, INC. and MUELLER SPORTS MEDICINE, INC.
Applied Biokinetics LLC v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
as 22-2039
Plaintiff / Appellant:
APPLIED BIOKINETICS LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
CVS PHARMACY, INC. and MUELLER SPORTS MEDICINE, INC.
Applied Biokinetics LLC v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
as 22-2040
Plaintiff / Appellant:
APPLIED BIOKINETICS LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
CVS PHARMACY, INC. and MUELLER SPORTS MEDICINE, INC.
RiggsIn re: Riggs
as 22-1945
Appellant:
In re: GLENN E. RIGGS, JOSEPH J. BAINOR, STANLEY M. BAINOR and others
Appellee:
KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
RiggsIn re: Riggs
as 21-2108
Appellant:
RALPH K. BRECHTER, LOUIS F. INDELICATO, JON L. CLOW and others
Appellee:
ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Richmond v. US
as 21-2012
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BOBBY MARBURGER, KIMBERLY BUSH, JAMES KIRKLAND and others
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Richmond v. US
as 21-125
Respondent:
CARL WARNER, JOSEPH AUGUSTA, CHARLES PINNIZZOTTO and others
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES
Avalos v. US
as 21-119
Respondent:
THOMAS RHINEHART, JR., JASON DIGNAN, JOSEPH AUGUSTA and others
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES
BROOKER et al v. USA
as 1:2012cv00605
Plaintiff:
CAREY W. BROOKER, LENORA RENEE BROOKER, RUSSELL JAY GOULD and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
WOLFSEN LAND & CATTLE COMPANY et al v. USA
as 1:2010cv00580
Plaintiff:
WOLFSEN LAND & CATTLE COMPANY , TURNER ISLAND FARMS, INC. , WEST TURNER ISLAND RANCH and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
