Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Meadows on Memorial Owners v. US
as 21-1214
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KAWAL KAREAH, XINDI BENAVENTE, KIMBERLY BOOTH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
MEADOWS ON MEMORIAL OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC. et al v. USA
as 1:2017cv01457
Plaintiff:
MEADOWS ON MEMORIAL OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC. , SHERRY FENK , EDWARD FENK and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
LARSON et al v. USA
as 1:2014cv00646
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DEAN LARSON and JUDITH MEADOWS LARSON
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
MEADOWS v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2012vv00105
Petitioner:
KORTNEY MEADOWS
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
Type:
Other Statutes
REPUBLIC SAVINGS BANK V US
as 08-5075
Plaintiff-Cross Appellant:
MCB Financial Group, Inc., Meadows Resources, Inc., Republic Holding Company and others
Defendant-Appellant:
United States
GREENBRIER V US
as 07-5100
Plaintiff-Appellant:
5000 South Hampton Terrace, American River Limited Partnership, Aspen Manor, Limited Partnership and others
Defendant-Appellee:
United States
CARABETTA ENTERPRISES V US
as 06-5037
Plaintiff-Cross Appellant:
CARABETTA ENTERPRISES, INC., CARABETTA MANAGEMENT COMPANY, CR HEDGEWOOD LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and others
Defendant-Appellant:
UNITED STATES, UNITED STATES and UNITED STATES
NORMAN V US
as 05-5039
Plaintiff-Appellant:
DON ROGER NORMAN, ROGER WILLIAM NORMAN and SOUTH MEADOWS PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Defendant-Appellee:
UNITED STATES
HOWARD V US
as 03-1338
Plaintiff-Appellant:
ALFRED WOLFE, BYRON HOWARD, CHARLES D. REVIE and others
Defendant-Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, DONALD H. RUMSFELD, Secretary of Defense, UNITED STATES and others
ANAHEIM GARDENS V US
as 01-5011
Plaintiff-Appellant:
185-225 PARKHILL CORP., 3740 SILVERLAKE VILLAGE, 5324 FOOTHILL APARTMENTS and others
Defendant-Appellee:
UNITED STATES, UNITED STATES and UNITED STATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
