Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Jackler v. DOJ
as 26-1575
Petitioner:
MEGAN JACKLER and BRANDON JAROCH
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and DIRECTOR OF THE OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
Amicus Curiae:
MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTIONS BOARD PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION, SENATOR ANGELA ALSOBROOKS, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES and others
MARLETT v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2025vv01977
Petitioner:
MEGAN MARLETT
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
GRIFFIN v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2025vv01556
Petitioner:
MEGAN GRIFFIN
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
HAYNES v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2025vv00182
Petitioner:
MEGAN HAYNES
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
BERTHIAUME v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00240
Petitioner:
MEGAN BERTHIAUME
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
RozmanIn re: Rozman
as 24-1063
Appellant:
In re: MEGAN ROZMAN, MELANIE ROZMAN, MORGAN ROZMAN and others
Appellee:
KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
PETERSON v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv01779
Petitioner:
MEGAN PETERSON
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
ABAD et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv01393
Plaintiff:
DAWN ABAD, ROBERT ABAD, DAWN ARCHER and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
ROGERS v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv00116
Petitioner:
MEGAN ROGERS
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
