Cases filed in the Federal Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 31
JOHNSON v. USA
as 1:2024cv00761
Plaintiff: MICHAEL D. JOHNSON
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Webb v. Garland
as 22-2065
Petitioner / Appellant: MICHAEL D. WEBB
Respondent / Appellee: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
RiggsIn re: Riggs
as 22-1945
Appellant: In re: GLENN E. RIGGS, JOSEPH J. BAINOR, STANLEY M. BAINOR and others
Appellee: KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Behrens v. US
as 22-1277
Plaintiff: DAVID H. BEHRENS, ARLINE M. BEHRENS, JEREMY MILLS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARK W. HEINTZ, HELEN M. HEINTZ, GORDON S. GEHLERT and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES
RiggsIn re: Riggs
as 21-2108
Appellant: RALPH K. BRECHTER, LOUIS F. INDELICATO, JON L. CLOW and others
Appellee: ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Akpeneye v. US We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1622
Plaintiff / Appellant: WILLIAM A. CUMMINGS, CHARLES DELUGO, KEVIN TINDAL, SR. and others
Plaintiff: JONATHAN ALLEN and SALI ALPHAEK, et al.
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES
Hancock v. DVA
as 20-1474
Petitioner: MICHAEL D. HANCOCK
Respondent: DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
In re: Webb We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-100
Petitioner: In re: MICHAEL D. WEBB
Respondent: MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD
BERRY v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2011vv00882
Petitioner: MICHAEL D BERRY
Respondent: SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
STOFFEL V DVA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-7098
Claimant-Appellant: Michael D. Stoffel

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?