Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Rex Medical, L.P. v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
as 24-1125
Plaintiff / Appellee:
REX MEDICAL, L.P.
Defendant / Appellant:
INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC., INTUITIVE SURGICAL OPERATIONS, INC. and INTUITIVE SURGICAL HOLDINGS, LLC
Rex Medical, L.P. v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc.
as 24-1072
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REX MEDICAL, L.P.
Defendant / Cross Appellant:
INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC. and INTUITIVE SURGICAL HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
INTUITIVE SURGICAL OPERATIONS, INC.
Intuitive Surgical, Inc. v. Rex Medical, L.P.
as 21-1862
Appellant:
INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC.
Appellee:
REX MEDICAL, L.P.
BHL PROPERTIES, LLC et al v. USA
as 1:2015cv00179
Plaintiff:
BHL PROPERTIES, LLC , GREGORY A. CONRAD , THOMAS DEBRABANDER and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
NELSON V MSPB
as 10-3152
Respondent:
Merit Systems Protection Board, United States Postal Service, Merit Systems Protection Board and others
Petitioner:
Rex T. Nelson, Rex T. Nelson, Rex T. Nelson and others
KIMBELL v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2010vv00364
Petitioner:
REX KIMBELL
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
BOYE V US
as 10-5043
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Chalene Bahe, Clinton Curtis, Dale Dennison and others
Counterclaimant-Appellee:
United States, United States, United States and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009vv00628
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
TIVO V ECHOSTAR
as 09-1374
Amicus Curiae:
Acushnet Company, Adam Mossoff, Amazon.com, Inc. and others
Defendant-Appellant:
Dish Network Corporation, EchoSphere Limited Liability Company, EchoStar Corporation and others
Plaintiff-Appellee:
TiVo Inc.
RASMUSON et al v. USA
as 1:2009cv00158
Plaintiff:
MARK R. RASMUSON , BRENDA S. RASMUSON , IVA MILLER and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
