Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Inventist Inc. v. Ninebot Inc. (USA)
as 24-1267
Plaintiff / Appellant:
INVENTIST INC. and SHANE CHEN
Defendant / Appellee:
NINEBOT INC. (USA), dba Ninebot US Inc., NINEBOT (TIANJIN) TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. and NINEBOT INC. (CHINA)
Inventist Inc. v. Ninebot Inc. (USA)
as 24-1010
Plaintiff / Appellee:
INVENTIST INC. and SHANE CHEN
Defendant / Appellant:
NINEBOT INC. (USA), dba Ninebot US Inc., NINEBOT (TIANJIN) TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. and NINEBOT INC. (CHINA)
HARKINS et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv01238
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER HARKINS, CARRIE LEE GAGNON, SHANE NOLAN and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
POTTER et al
as 1:2023cv01203
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL POTTER, EDGAR ORDORICA, ROBERT REAVIS and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
BROWN v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv00752
Petitioner:
SHANE BROWN
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
SHANE LLC et al v. USA
as 1:2022cv01775
Plaintiff:
SHANE LLC, DIAMETRIC LLC and GREENFIELD AVENUE PROPERTIES LLC
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
BARRON et al v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv01336
Petitioner:
SHANE BARRON, SCOTT BARRON and NICOLA BOUGHTON
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Shane v. Newell Brands Inc.
as 22-1996
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD SHANE
Defendant / Appellee:
NEWELL BRANDS INC. and GRACO CHILDREN'S PRODUCTS, INC.
Defendant:
DOES 1-10, INCLUSIVE
Nation v. US
as 22-1256
Plaintiff:
MARK WAYNE NATION, MICHAEL JOE HORTON, KENNETH DESHAWN EDWARDS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD RODRICK MACDONALD
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Razor USA LLC v. ITC
as 21-1780
Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
Appellant:
RAZOR USA LLC, SHANE CHEN and INVENTIST, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
