Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Dawson v. US
as 23-1971
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOE L. DAWSON, CONRAD C. COX, MARY R. COX, Trustees of the Conrad C. Cox Trust No. 1 and the Mary R. Cox Trust No. 1 and others
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Dawson v. US
as 23-1927
Plaintiff:
JOE L. DAWSON, CONRAD C. COX, MARY R. COX, Trustees of the Conrad C. Cox Trust No. 1 and the Mary R. Cox Trust No. 1 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JASON DIAL, TRAVIS DIAL, M. LEE JUENEMANN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Dawson v. US
as 23-1923
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOE L. DAWSON, CONRAD C. COX, MARY R. COX, Trustees of the Conrad C. Cox Trust No. 1 and the Mary R. Cox Trust No. 1 and others
Plaintiff:
JASON DIAL, TRAVIS DIAL, M. LEE JUENEMANN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
MATTHEWS v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv01396
Petitioner:
SHERRY MATTHEWS
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
NGUYEN v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv00765
Petitioner:
SHERRIE NGUYEN
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
SMILOW v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv00425
Petitioner:
SHERRI SMILOW
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
GRABP v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv00375
Petitioner:
SHERRIE GRABP
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
MCNEY v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv00034
Petitioner:
SHERRY MCNEY
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Behrens v. US
as 22-1277
Plaintiff:
DAVID H. BEHRENS, ARLINE M. BEHRENS, JEREMY MILLS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK W. HEINTZ, HELEN M. HEINTZ, GORDON S. GEHLERT and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
