Cases 1 - 10 of 40
GOMES v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2025vv02084
Petitioner:
SHERRY GOMES
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
LILLY v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2025vv00726
Petitioner:
SHERRI LILLY
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
BARRY et al v. USA
as 1:2025cv00453
Plaintiff:
M. L. ONNA BARRY, SHERRI LEIGH BETHEL, KIMBERLY K. COLLINS and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
BERRY v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00896
Petitioner:
SHERRI BERRY
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
ELLSWORTH v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00812
Petitioner:
SHERRY ELLSWORTH
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Dawson v. US
as 23-1971
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOE L. DAWSON, CONRAD C. COX, MARY R. COX, Trustees of the Conrad C. Cox Trust No. 1 and the Mary R. Cox Trust No. 1 and others
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Dawson v. US
as 23-1927
Plaintiff:
JOE L. DAWSON, CONRAD C. COX, MARY R. COX, Trustees of the Conrad C. Cox Trust No. 1 and the Mary R. Cox Trust No. 1 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JASON DIAL, TRAVIS DIAL, M. LEE JUENEMANN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Dawson v. US
as 23-1923
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOE L. DAWSON, CONRAD C. COX, MARY R. COX, Trustees of the Conrad C. Cox Trust No. 1 and the Mary R. Cox Trust No. 1 and others
Plaintiff:
JASON DIAL, TRAVIS DIAL, M. LEE JUENEMANN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
MATTHEWS v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv01396
Petitioner:
SHERRY MATTHEWS
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
