Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Alexsam, Inc. v. Simon Property Group (Texas), L.P.
as 25-1137
Defendant:
SIMON PROPERTY GROUP (TEXAS), L.P. and BLACKHAWK NETWORK, INC.
Plaintiff:
ALEXSAM, INC.
:
SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, L.P.
Alexsam, Inc. v. Simon Property Group (Texas), L.P.
as 25-1138
Defendant:
SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, L.P. and SIMON PROPERTY GROUP (TEXAS), L.P.
Plaintiff:
ALEXSAM, INC.
Cross-Defendant:
BLACKHAWK NETWORK, INC.
SIMON v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv01128
Petitioner:
LINDA SIMON
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
BUI v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00783
Petitioner:
SIMONE BUI
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Allen v. US
as 23-2225
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WAYNE E. ALLEN, JOSEPH E. ARMSTEAD, LAWRENCE C. BECKER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Alexsam, Inc. v. Simon Property Group, L.P.
as 22-1598
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALEXSAM, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
SIMON PROPERTY GROUP (TEXAS), L.P., BLACKHAWK NETWORK, INC., US BANK NA and others
GurveyIn re: Gurvey
as 23-134
Petitioner:
In re: AMY REBECCA GURVEY
Respondent:
COWAN, LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN, P.C., CLEAR CHANNEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC., LIVE NATION, INC. and others
RichmondIn re: Richmond
as 22-2251
Appellant:
In re: SIMON NICHOLAS RICHMOND
Appellee:
KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Soto v. US
as 22-2011
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SIMON A. SOTO, on behalf of himself and all other individuals similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES
MYERS v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv00534
Petitioner:
SIMON MYERS
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
